Kevin Regan
PhD Computer Science
ML Engineer @ Google
Professional Work
I currently work at Google where I focus on very large scale machine learning for ad click prediction.

I recently completed Google's Machine Learning Ninja program where worked on models for facial recognition, and investigated large margin methods for deep learning (published at NeuIPS 2018).
Research Background
My doctoral work focused on preference elicitation techniques for sequential decision making—and intersects Decision Making, Probablistic Modeling, Machine Learning and Optimization.
Select Publications
NeurIPS 18
Large Margin Deep Networks for Classification
H. Mobahi, D. Krishnan, G. Elsayed, K. Regan and S. Bengio
Thirty-second Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
We present a formulation of deep learning that aims at producing a large margin classifier. The notion of margin, minimum distance to a decision boundary, has served as the foundation of several theoretically profound and empirically suc- cessful results for both classification and regression tasks. However, most large margin algorithms are applicable only to shallow models with a preset feature representation; and conventional margin methods for neural networks only enforce margin at the output layer. Such methods are therefore not well suited for deep networks. In this work, we propose a novel loss function to impose a margin on any chosen set of layers of a deep network (including input and hidden layers). Our formulation allows choosing any lp norm (p >= 1) on the metric measuring the margin. We demonstrate that the decision boundary obtained by our loss has nice properties compared to standard classification loss functions. Specifically, we show improved empirical results on the MNIST, CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets on multiple tasks: generalization from small training sets, corrupted labels, and robustness against adversarial perturbations. The resulting loss is general and complementary to existing data augmentation (such as random/adversarial input transform) and regularization techniques (weight decay, dropout, and batch norm).
@inproceedings{elsayed2018large, title={Large margin deep networks for classification}, author={Elsayed, Gamaleldin and Krishnan, Dilip and Mobahi, Hossein and Regan, Kevin and Bengio, Samy}, booktitle={Advances in neural information processing systems}, pages={842--852}, year={2018} }
Robust Online Optimization of Reward-uncertain MDPs
Kevin Regan and Craig Boutilier
Twenty-Second Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Imprecise-reward Markov decision processes (IRMDPs) are MDPs in which the reward function is only partially specified (e.g., by some elicitation process). Recent work using minimax regret to solve IRMDPs has shown, despite theoretical intractability, how the set of policies that are nondom- inated w.r.t. reward uncertainty can be exploited to accelerate regret computation. However, the number of nondominated policies is generally so large as to undermine this leverage. In this paper, we show how the quality of the approximation can be improved online by pruning/adding nondominated policies during reward elicitation, while maintain- ing computational tractability. Drawing insights from the POMDP literature, we also develop a new anytime algorithm for constructing the set of nondominated policies with provable (anytime) error bounds.
@article{ijcai2011:rb:a, author = {Kevin Regan and Craig Boutilier}, title = { Robust Online Optimization of Reward-uncertain MDPs }, journal = { Twenty-Second Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011) }, year = {2011} }
Online Feature Elicitation in Interactive Optimization
Craig Boutilier, Kevin Regan and Paolo Viappiani
International Conference on Machine Learning
Most models of utility elicitation in decision support and interactive optimization assume a predefined set of "catalog" features over which user preferences are expressed. However, users may differ in the features over which they are most comfortable expressing their preferences. In this work we consider the problem of feature elicitation: a user's utility function is expressed using features whose definitions (in terms of "catalog" features) are unknown. We cast this as a problem of concept learning, but whose goal is to identify only enough about the concept to enable a good decision to be recommended. We describe computational procedures for identifying optimal alternatives w.r.t. minimax regret in the presence of concept uncertainty; and describe several heuristic query strategies that focus on reduction of relevant concept uncertainty.
@article{icml09brv, author = {Craig Boutilier, Kevin Regan and Paolo Viappiani}, title = { Online Feature Elicitation in Interactive Optimization }, journal = { ICML-09 Iternational Conference on Machine Learning }, year = {2009} }
UAI 09
Regret-based Reward Elicitation for Markov Decision Processes
Kevin Regan and Craig Boutilier
The 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
The specification of a Markov decision process (MDP) can be difficult. Reward function specification is especially problematic; in practice, it is often cognitively complex and time-consuming for users to precisely specify rewards. This work casts the problem of specifying rewards as one of preference elicitation and aims to minimize the degree of precision with which a reward function must be specified while still allowing optimal or near-optimal policies to be produced. We first discuss how robust policies can be computed for MDPs given only partial reward information using the minimax regret criterion. We then demonstrate how regret can be reduced by efficiently eliciting reward information using bound queries, using regret-reduction as a means for choosing suitable queries. Empirical results demonstrate that regret-based reward elicitation offers an effective way to produce near-optimal policies without resorting to the precise specification of the entire reward function.
@article{uai09rb, author = {Kevin Regan and Craig Boutilier}, title = { Regret-based Reward Elicitation for Markov Decision Processes }, journal = { UAI-09 The 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence }, year = {2009} }